Capture the Flag

One of my favorite activities as a young Boy Scout was a game called "Capture the Flag." Part of its attraction for me was its competitive nature, its activity level and the requirement of stealth. It was also played in the dark. The idea of the game was to divide into two teams, each having a flag. The playing area needed to be large and was divided into two sections, one for each team. Your team would place its flag somewhere in its area and put some defenders to guard it. The rest of the team, by stealth and speed, would try to sneak into the opponents territory and capture their flag and return it to your own territory, thereby declaring victory. If you got caught in the opponent's territory you were captured (by being tagged) and then you could only be freed if a teammate tagged you without getting caught. The distinguishing feature of the game was the center line that divided the two teams. There was no gray area, there was no neutral area, no rest area, you were either in your territory or you weren't.

As the health care bill has passed Congress and been signed into law by the President, I listen to the rhetoric coming from several different groups, including the two political parties and an abundance of commentators and I am reminded of my boyhood game of capture the flag. A colleague suggested to me the other day that we had lots of politicians in Washington, but very few statesmen. What he meant by that was that he felt like we had lots of people who would take up their party's ideological positions but no one who could construct a viable compromise in the heat of ideological battles. I am inclined to agree with him. There is no gray area, no neutral area, there is only one or the other with a line drawn down the middle. And those of us who are in the middle are left out. We come to elections looking for statesmen who will negotiate legislation that is good for America and what we get are party loyalists whose decisions are shaped by how well their party will fare in the next election.

As I listened to the White House summit on health care I heard repeatedly, from both parties, the statement, "We're not that far apart." Yet neither party and none of the individuals present would consider moving off of their respective side. Somehow they are worried that they might cross the center line into the opposition territory and be "captured." What I did hear was statements about "ramming a bill through" and "let's scrap this bill and start over." Neither idea was palatable to me. The line was drawn and no one is willing to cross over.

A person recently posted a comment on Facebook saying that they supported health care reform, but didn't like some of the things in the law. I agree. For seven years I have worked with various groups, state and federal government officials and representatives, and interfaith groups for health car reform, and there are some things in this law I don't like either. But we will never have a perfect bill in this country. The two extremes are not ever going to come together with anything that everyone can agree on. We continue to draw lines that divide us on global warming, the economy, jobs, and yes, even now that it is law, health care reform. We cannot continue to debate while people go without health care. We cannot continue to scrap everything and start over. This is too important

"We are a Christian nation" is a statement that I hear frequently. And if so, then I ask us to consider, what would our Lord do, what does God require of us. Micah's answer is "to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly" with our God. And even though Jesus did not agree with the Pharisees, when Nicodemus came to him, Jesus was willing to talk. I see no places in the life and ministry of Jesus where he drew lines that excluded people. I see no places in the ministry of Jesus where ideology or culture overrides the precept of love and grace. The provision of health care in our country has become a business, a for profit, in most cases, business. And while that may be either good or bad depending on your ideology, I ask us to consider how we sacrifice someone's health and health care for money. Now you may say that if someone in our country needs care they can get it. And I agree - emergency care. But why do we insist on spending untold millions of dollars to pay for emergency care much of which could have possibly been prevented if that person had access to regular and routine medical care? And I wonder how Jesus reacts when we tell someone that they must surrender their home to pay for medical bills, or that they will not longer have insurance coverage because their condition is too costly to the insurance company.

I hear Jesus proclaiming his mission in Luke (4:16-21) to be,at least in part, about healing. I hear his testimony in the 25th chapter of Matthew suggest that we are doing the work he has called us to when we provide healing for those who are sick. I hear his command to Peter and the disciples in John 20 to feed and tend his sheep and I wonder what will become of us as we continue to draw lines that separate us. It is difficult to read the New Testament, especially though the Old as well, and not hear the call to be a community in God through Jesus Christ. And I wonder what will become of our faith and our nation as we continue to draw lines that separate and divide. Government should not be a giant game of capture the flag. Government that is of by and for the people should be about finding ways to make laws that all of us can live with together - as a community.